Skip to main content

Risk Register


there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to identify and manage hazards

When it comes to risk management, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to identify and manage hazards. The chosen assessment method should align with the desired output based on the stage at which the assessment is undertaken. It is essential to start risk management and risk assessment processes as early as possible.

What is a Risk Register?

A risk register is a strategic tool utilized to identify, track, and manage risks that can impact activities, with potential negative or positive effects. It serves as a critical component of the risk management process, ensuring that risks are systematically addressed and mitigated.

Key Functions of a Risk Register

  1. Identification of Risks: The primary function of a risk register is to identify potential risks that could affect a project’s success or operations.
  2. Tracking Risks: Once identified, the risks are recorded and monitored. This ongoing tracking helps in understanding the evolution of risks over time.
  3. Managing Risks: The risk register helps in planning and implementing strategies to mitigate or capitalize on risks, ensuring proactive management.

Versatility in Use

  • Standalone Tool: A risk register can be employed independently as a comprehensive method for risk assessment.
  • Higher-Level Management Tool: It can also function as part of a broader risk management strategy, supported by additional risk assessment methods. These methods serve to identify and manage hazards at various stages of activities.

Integration with Other Methods

The output from other risk assessment techniques can either feed into the risk register or be tracked using it. This integration allows for a cohesive and comprehensive approach to risk management.

Scope and Application

A risk register is flexible and can be used to track and manage various types of risks. Its application and the specific risks tracked within it can be tailored to the unique needs and objectives of the organization or project.

When to Use a Risk Register

A risk register should be implemented at the earliest possible stage of any organization, project, or activity. This proactive approach is essential because:

  1. Early Identification and Management: As organizations and projects develop and grow, the complexity and number of potential risks increase. Addressing risks early ensures they are managed before they escalate.
  2. Consistency and Standardization: Using an agreed format and maintaining a consistent, standardized approach to tracking risks is crucial. This consistency ensures that the risk management process remains effective and doesn’t become neglected.
  3. Preventing Oversight: Without a risk register, it’s likely that some risks will go unnoticed. This oversight can leave your organization vulnerable to increasing levels of unmanaged risk across various platforms.
  4. Maximizing Opportunities: Proper risk management not only mitigates negative impacts but also identifies opportunities where risk can be leveraged to benefit the organization.

As soon as an element that could impact activities is identified, it should be assessed for potential risk.

Risk Register Content

The content of a risk register should be relevant and impactful to your activities. Here are key considerations and elements to include:

Importance of Early Identification

  • Future Relevance: It is crucial to track elements that may not currently impact your activities but could become significant as your organization evolves. By monitoring these elements from the outset, you can more readily identify when they become relevant.
  • Proactive Response: Early tracking enables a proactive response, allowing you to react positively and take appropriate actions when changes occur.

Types of Risks to Track

A risk register can be used to log and track both strategic and operational risks:

  1. Strategic Risk: These are higher-level risks that impact an organization’s ability to develop, implement, and execute its overall strategy. Strategic risks include:
    • Competitor influence
    • Supply chain, stakeholder, or vendor issues
    • Customer demands and requirements
    • Management changes and shifts in business direction
    • Company reputation
    • Regulatory compliance
  2. Operational Risk: These risks are focused on immediate and tangible threats to daily operations, activities, and processes. Operational risks include:
    • Procedure or process failures
    • Human error
    • Equipment breakdowns or malfunctions
    • Contractual risks

Projects often encompass both strategic and operational risks, so a risk register for a project should consider both types.

Interrelation of Risks

  • Mutual Impact: Strategic and operational risks often influence each other, making it sometimes difficult to distinguish between the two. A well-defined risk management process can help in identifying which risk assessment methods are suitable for managing both areas.

Opportunities in Risk

  • Beyond Avoidance: Risk assessment should not be limited to avoiding negative consequences. Evaluate all risks to see if the potential for growth outweighs the potential for harm. Use this evaluation to inform decision-making and identify opportunities for growth.

By carefully considering these elements and incorporating them into your risk register, you can effectively manage and leverage risks to benefit your organization.

Other Risk Assessment Methods

Different risk assessment methods cater to various scenarios, each with a unique purpose. There is no single “catch-all” method. While some methods can be applied to strategic risk, most are more relevant to operational risk. A project or operational activity requires risk assessment techniques suited to its specific stage.

Supplementing the Risk Register

The risk register serves as a higher-level assessment tool, with other risk assessment methods used to supplement it, particularly for managing operational risks. These methods provide detailed analysis and management of specific hazards that the risk register may not cover comprehensively.

Distinct Formats and Purposes

Using a risk register to identify hazards in design or early-stage methodology in a project aimed at implementing safer design can be ineffective. The format and content of a risk register differ significantly from other risk assessment methods due to the specific outputs required from each.

  • Risk Register: Typically more detailed, encompassing a broad range of risks and their potential impacts on the organization.
  • Other Risk Assessment Methods: Focused on specific hazards, providing targeted insights and management strategies for particular aspects of a project or operation.

Example: Construction Project

Consider a construction project involving extensive demolition and ground clearance. The work is spread over several areas and stages. Assessing each stage on a risk register would be impractical. Instead, a HAZID (Hazard Identification) assessment is conducted for each stage of demolition and clearance. Hazards identified in this process are logged and managed using the HAZID assessment worksheet. The requirement for HAZID is noted in the risk register, tracked, and marked as completed once the HAZID is closed.

Supplementary Risk Assessment Methods

  • HAZID (Hazard Identification): Identifies potential hazards in the early stages of a project.
  • HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study): Examines processes to identify and mitigate potential operational hazards.
  • HIRA (Hazard Identification Risk Assessment): Evaluates risks associated with specific hazards to ensure safety and compliance.
  • TRA (Task Risk Assessment): Assesses risks related to particular tasks, ensuring safe and effective task execution.

These methods provide the necessary detail and focus for managing specific risks, complementing the broader scope of the risk register.

Developing a Risk Register

In some organizations, a dedicated risk manager is responsible for developing and maintaining a risk register. However, in many cases, the task falls to the project manager to implement a risk register for their specific project. Typically, organizations utilize spreadsheets to create a risk register, employing a variety of column headings to dictate the necessary inputs. Given its importance, creating a risk register is a critical component of risk management and should be carried out by someone with appropriate expertise and knowledge in risk management as well as familiarity with the activities being logged and tracked.

Adding content to a risk register should be a collaborative effort. All individuals involved in the project possess unique insights, perceptions, and understandings of the risks the organization faces and must contribute to the risk register. It is essential to incorporate all possible sources for risk identification, including external ones. Clients and third parties may have valuable experience or knowledge that is not available within the organization, and their input should be utilized as a source of information.

A risk register should be reviewed and updated frequently as new risks are identified and existing risks are reassessed. Regular, predetermined intervals should be set aside to formally review and update the content of the risk register. This ensures that the risk register remains current and effective in managing and mitigating risks.

Risk Register Format

A risk register should be recorded into a tabular worksheet using predefined headings. Given that multiple individuals may need to work on the risk register, it’s important that the worksheet is easily accessible and editable.

The column headings in a risk register depend on the desired level of detail. Generally, risk registers follow a simple five-step process:

  1. Identify the hazard.
  2. Decide who might be harmed and how.
  3. Evaluate the risk and determine whether existing control measures are adequate or if more should be done.
  4. Record your findings.
  5. Review, reassess, and track.

A crucial element of this process is having an agreed-upon Risk Classification Matrix, which clearly defines the levels of consequence, probability, and the ‘at risk’ categories. The Risk Classification Matrix is used to assign a risk value (typically low, medium, or high) based on the selected consequence and probability. These risk values should align with Risk Acceptance Levels, which define what is considered low, medium, or high, and what is acceptable.

Control measures, whether existing or proposed, need to be documented. After implementing these control measures, the risk value should be reassessed to determine if the risk acceptance level has shifted to a more acceptable level.

It is also essential to note the responsible party and mark the status of each action as Open or Closed.

The RISKUL Risk Register is a designed format that enables comprehensive logging and tracking of risks, providing an immediate view of priority risks and residual risk values.

Risk Register Reporting

Many organizations require summary reporting from a risk register, such as identifying the top five current risks or the value/score of residual risk from open items. It is crucial to determine reporting requirements early in the development of the risk register to ensure that its format aligns with these expectations.

Understanding these reporting needs from the outset allows for the inclusion of necessary data fields and ensures that the risk register can easily generate the required reports. This proactive approach facilitates efficient and accurate reporting, enabling stakeholders to quickly identify and respond to the most critical risks.















Encourage collective input from different departments within the organization, each department will have unique insights into the specific risks they face. Engage personnel at various levels, senior managers provide a strategic overview, while frontline employees offer practical insights into daily operational risks.

Identify risks across various categories, including strategic, operational, financial, compliance, reputational, and project-specific risks. Focus on identification of risk that can have a negative or positive impact on the organization, this ensures that all areas of potential impact are covered.

The risk register provides a comprehensive snapshot of the organization’s risk landscape, highlighting critical areas requiring immediate attention. It identifies potential opportunities for growth, supports informed decision-making at all levels, details necessary control measures and mitigation strategies, and monitors progress towards defined objectives.


RISKUL offers a comprehensive suite of risk assessment and risk management tools, comprising five distinct methodologies. The RISKUL Risk Register tool incorporates over 40 specific design and functionality features that are exclusive to RISKUL.

In addition to Risk Register, RISKUL encompasses other essential risk assessment methods, including HAZID, HAZOP, HIRA, TRA, and Opportunity Worksheet. Each method provides unique insights and approaches to effectively identify, analyse, and mitigate risks.

We invite you to experience the benefits of RISKUL by taking advantage of our 30-day free trial. Alternatively, feel free to reach out to us for a consultation to explore how RISKUL can revolutionise your organisations risk management practices. Discover the power of RISKUL and elevate your approach to risk management.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH2Nv59LQ4U
Detailed & Simple

Begin Your 30 Day Free Trial

We’ll Get You Set Up Right Away – No Credit Card or Payment Info Needed

Get your 30 Day Free Trial Today